Sender Of "Love Thy Neighbor" Anti-Choice Abortion Flyer Campaign Comes Forward

neighbors-spooked-after-anti-abortion-flyers-MAIN.png

Graphic Warning: This article contains a graphic image on a flyer that we are sharing to give context to what citizens in Beacon received hand-delivered to their homes.

Back in June, 2020, a reader wrote into A Little Beacon Blog about a flyer they found to be disturbing, that had been put into their yard. The flyer contained a message of anti-choice abortion, and wasn’t the first time this reader had received a flyer. Last year around this time, the reader received a series of anti-gay fliers. This reader has a rainbow pride flag flying from their house, and says they are a queer family. Quickly, a rumor circulated that it was the KKK, which was reported by one news outlet but then retracted almost the same day.

This family wasn’t the only ones to receive the distributed flyers. Other residents with gay pride flags flying outside their homes had also received the flyers. The reader was spooked, has children, and was afraid to let their children play in the front yard. They wrote in: “I am hoping to raise awareness. There was a new wave of anti-choice abortion flyers distributed to the folks who have rainbow flags today. We got one last week and another 2 today thrown into our yard. Last year we got an anti-gay one (we are a queer family). I wanted to raise attention to it if others are receiving these too. I don’t want to be public on Facebook and open my family up further to harassment, but I wanted to draw some attention if there’s a larger trend.”

dick murphy flyer 1.JPG

Several other households had been receiving flyers. At least two others reached out to A Little Beacon Blog to submit photos of the flyers they received and shared with the police. Said one recipient, Kit Burke-Smith, who has a pride flag flying and is part of a straight family: “We believe we have been targeted each time because of our pride flag on our house. Generally, we have found our community to be wonderfully caring and supportive. Knowing that one of our neighbors is repeatedly attempting to intimidate us and others in our community is reprehensible and disappointing,” she told A Little Beacon Blog.

The original reader pursued various channels to get the mail to stop. “Last year, I reported the letter to the police. I spoke to [then] Mayor Casale and a few attorneys, reported the harassment to the postal police, the New York Hate Crimes division and many others. I had dozens of conversations to report the harassment, and to my knowledge, nothing was done.“

Then came 2020. In the middle of the pandemic, and during Pride Month, a new batch of letters arrived. The Beaconite continued: “A few weeks ago, we found the abortion one on the car. I ignored it, honestly. Then, Saturday, we got a new batch thrown into the yard. Other folks we know got them on the porch."

Councilperson Terry Nelson of Ward 1 spoke out against the flyer campaign during his Community Report section of a City Council Meeting, saying: “Unfortunately, a first-grader of one of those families found the letter,” he said. “This has to stop. You have to stop doing this. To the coward who left those fliers, myself and a bunch of other people are allies of the LBGTQ community and just know that there are more of us than there are of you.”

Flyer recipients began suspecting that one of their neighbors was the sender. A Little Beacon Blog asked if they had considered simply approaching their neighbor to ask them to stop. Their response: “I am nervous about my children playing in the front yard.”

Style And Tone Of Letters And Flyers Begin To Match A Public Figure

Having seen the content of the letter, the style and tone resembled that of another Beaconite who has published his statements against abortion before in the Beacon Free Press an on his own blog. The style was so close, in fact, it resembled this letter to the editor published last year that sparked a large backlash to the newspaper for even publishing it. Here at A Little Beacon Blog, it inspired an article to be written about censorship. The writer, Richard (Dick) Murphy, had cried out to his newsletter list about local newspapers who had censored him. A Little Beacon Blog wrote in response the need for censorship, why it is helpful in some cases, and how it happens every single day because media outlets simply cannot publish all of the words in all of the world every single day.

Just as we were going to cross reference the styles, another Beacon resident received a postmarked letter from R. Murphy, with his return address on it. The postmark was out of Albany. The letter began by referencing his former political campaigning days: “I prefer handouts to signs, too many of them during my political campaigns I guess.” He signed the letter Dick Murphy. A Little Beacon Blog put on the list of things to do: “Email Richard Murphy to ask him if he is the same R. Murphy from the signed letter, and if he has been distributing unsigned flyers.”

When readers write in to you, spooked for their own safety and the safety of their children, a blogger will seek truth. While it seems unkind to call attention to someone who is doing something that most people would find mentally unhealthy, even if most of their intentions in other parts of their lives are good, to the receivers of the flyers and letters, they are frightened. Plus, conclusions are fabricated and made up. For instance, because this happened during the BLM protests all over the world,that the flyers were from the KKK. So to help these people find an answer and ease their fear, this article was produced.

Confirmation Pursued; Confirmation Received

On July 16, 2020, an email came into my inbox from Richard (Dick) Murphy. It happens from time to time. Richard (he prefers to go by Dick), sends emails to his list of about 125 people, most of whom never signed up for his list, wanting to know their opinions of his latest blog posts. Years ago, without my approval, and without me even knowing who he was, Richard added me to his newsletter list. When he can’t get published in a newspaper, he emails this list of email addresses to rant about it, and rails about the First Amendment protecting his right to get published in a newspaper.

Some people request to be removed from his list, and then he denies their request, citing the First Amendment. His response last year on July 19, 2019 to my request to be removed, when I referred him to the Can-Spam Act: “THE CAN-SPAM Act...gad! Never said you were required.” And then I was never removed.

This time, on July 16, 2020, he asked us what we thought of the removal General Lee’s statue. This sounds pretty random, and it is. Richard has a thought, blogs about it, and then emails us on his list. Richard didn’t specify which General Lee statue. My assumption is that he is referring to the 6-story statue in Richmond, VA. I replied to him via email by asking him questions about the flyers and the letters he sent with his signature and home address on them in the return address section of the envelope.

On July 17, 2020, Richard (Dick) emailed me back about the flyers. Hi hit Reply-All to his whole list, and sent me the below response:

“Regarding the First Amendment, it's a glorious thing. Hand delivering information to houses is done all the time especially during political campaigns and unfortunately it now seems it is always political campaign time in our country. The news is full of it, the media the newspapers etc. If a citizen thinks certain topics are not being given sufficient coverage or if local newspapers avoid printing letters of one opinion or another it is incumbent to find alternative ways to communicate. As I said, Isn't the First Amendment wonderful and isn't a healthy, reasoned and honest exchange of ideas what democracy is all about? Really, a "Love thy Neighbor" message shouldn't be all that "disturbing" or "scary." And, regarding "grotesque? Isn't 60,000,000 new lives destroyed by abortion since Roe rather grotesque? Let's keep the exchange going for the sake of democracy and the nation we love.

Sincerely, Dick

PS.Please include my remarks in your article and also invite the complaints to join in the discussion. This is hardly "targeting." It; a call for honest, reasoned dialogue and debate, It's just what the country needs.”

How The City Of Beacon Responded

In June 2020, Pride Month, Mayor Lee Kyriacou donated a pride flag to City Hall. The rainbow flag flew all month. A Little Beacon Blog reached out to the Mayor, the City Administrator Anthony Ruggiero, and to Terry Nelson who had first spoken against the flyers, asking if the City had received any letters, since it had the pride flag, as well as how they felt about this outreach. Anthony usually knows the rules around campaigning, knocking on doors, and perhaps about distributing flyers, so we sought some guidance there.

So far, we have only received a response from Terry. Questions and answers are thus follows:

ALBB: During a City Council Meeting when you first addressed the issue, did you know who was placing and sending the flyers?

“I had my suspicions, but I couldn’t 100% confirm it.”

ALBB: How do you feel about a neighbor sending his neighbors mail about his personal views? On a repeated basis?

“I hate it because it is harassment, plain and simple. I even asked this individual to stop emailing me his hate filled, bigoted blog posts only to have him accuse me of violating his first amendment rights. I never asked to be placed on his email list. This has gone on for about two years.”

Who Is Richard (Dick) Murphy?

Richard lives in Beacon and cares about it very much. He has a political history, that for clarification sake, I asked him to confirm so that we can know how he served:

“By the 1960s I was teaching High School American History putting the stress on The Bill of Rights and specifically the First Amendment as well as the amendments aiming for political and racial equality, Getting into Democratic Politics in the 1970s and appointed by Mayor Cahill to Chair the Beacon Human Relations Committee, I aimed at the integration of the Beacon Volunteer Fire Department, accomplished in 1978. A Democrat for most of my life, I ran on the Party line for a seat in the County Legislature in 1979 and was defeated. Ran again in 1981 and won and was reelected eight times retiring in 1999. I became Minority Whip in the Legislature for several years serving under an excellent Minority Leader Mrs. Kip Bleakley. I was pushed into a dissenter role by the Party when it gagged Governor Casey of PA barring him from giving a pro-life address to the delegates at the 1992 Convention.“

On Censorship - What It Means To Publish Or Not Publish A Submitted Opinion

Photo Credit: Katie Hellmuth Martin

Photo Credit: Katie Hellmuth Martin

This month’s “Letters To The Editor” section of the Beacon Free Press got a little spicy. The letters are usually spirited with opinion, but this month, a single letter was published in opposition to gay people (there was one letter in the entire space - no other letters were published that week of July 17, 2019), and seven letters were published in response and in protest the following week, July 24, 2019.

The letter writer was Dick Murphy, a well-known emailer to people he has elected to send his thoughts to. He has put me on this email list, though I usually skip his emails (btw, it is in violation of the CAN-SPAM Act to add people to an email list without their permission). The email letters are usually about Democracy, Slavery, the U.S. Constitution, Catholicism, White Male Patriarchy, Kings and Queens, and so on.

When this “Letter to the Editor” popped into my email box, I ignored it (we don’t even have a “Letter to the Editor” section here at the blog). But the Beacon Free Press published it - as Dick Murphy was pushing censorship as his reason for why it should be published. Back in the email environment (I hadn’t seen the newspaper yet or read his letter) I began seeing people Replying All to ask to be removed from his list, to which he responded by accusing them of censorship. It was at that time that I read his letter, and asked him to remove me from his list as well.

What Was His Letter To The Editor About? What’s All The Fuss?

His letter was about his disagreement with the PEACE flag in rainbow colors that hung above Main Street in Beacon. In his disagreement with it, he cited military death tolls in World War II and Vietnam, mixing these statistics (uncited - the source of the numbers is unknown) with the number of Americans who have died from AIDS, and put forth his opinion about that. Personally, I found his opinion very sad. There is no current debate about it with two sides of anything to discuss. I moved along.

Until I saw that the Beacon Free Press published it. They have published other outlandish, accusatory advertorials (groups who buy ad space to slander other people), and this was another step in the eyebrow-raising direction of: “Really?”

The Beacon Free Press received an outcry from its readers, stating their disappointment in the newspaper’s choice to publish such an opinion. The following week, the paper published seven dissenting Letters to the Editor. Come to think of it, I don’t even know who the editor is at the Beacon Free Press, as they don’t publish their masthead in the printed paper. Their website reveals that the editor is Ray Fashona; in fact, he is the editor for all of Southern Dutchess News, which is the publisher of Beacon Free Press.

So what is censorship? Does it happen, and if so, is it OK?

What Is Censorship?

Censorship happens. It is real, and exists for reasons that protect something. According to the Britannica’s definition, censorship means “the suppression or prohibition of speech or writing that is deemed subversive of the common good.”

In terms of legality, anyone can censor, except for the United States government when it comes to making laws. The First Amendment does not mandate anyone to publish, listen to, or otherwise do anything with someone else’s right to say what they want to say.

The first line of the First Amendment reads: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”

People may not always agree when censorship happens, but censorship can protect good people from slander, verbal, physical, visual or emotional abuse, propagation of lies, and so forth. Social media companies have humans filtering out (aka censoring) photos and messages all day every day that any person can upload at any time that are inappropriate and harmful (See this Washington Post article, “Content moderators at YouTube, Facebook and Twitter see the worst of the web — and suffer silently.” This manual deletion of photos and comments at social media companies happens even more so now that social media platforms have been accused of not enough censorship of hate speech.

In government, censorship can happen in all forms, and is resisted against. For instance, in a recent vote July 2, 2019, in Putnam County, virtually any document can be hidden as “‘confidential’ to prevent their disclosure.” Any legislators, county officials and consultants can classify documents as “confidential.” This vote passed by 7-1. So far, this new law is seeing resistance from those in its community and the sole legislator who voted against it, and it is a story we are following.

Should A Newspaper Censor?

Every newspaper censors. Every publication of any kind censors, for several reasons:

  • A topic isn’t relevant to what else they are publishing. It’s not “timely.”

  • A topic isn’t relevant to their audience. Every single media outlet - be it TV, podcast, blog, newspaper, magazine, radio station - creates and publishes content that their audience would like, resonate with, or feel engaged by.

  • A newspaper ran out of space. It’s paper, so there is only so much space to say something.

  • A blog or any media outlet simply ran out of time and life marched forward! (argh, happens all the time here). This is called unintentional censorship. Some people want to see a story covered, and it doesn’t happen. So it could look like “they won’t cover it.” When really, it’s only because we are drowning in words already.

So when the Beacon Free Press published this letter, they made a choice. Was it the only letter submission they received that week? Why was it the only letter published? The following week, the letters that poured into the newspaper stating their disappointment with the newspaper apparently led the newspaper to dedicate almost 1.5 printed pages to publishing them.

Is A Newspaper Obligated To Print Everything?

No. For the reasons stated above. A newspaper - or any media outlet - may want to report on “both sides” of an issue. But in the contents of that letter, there are no sides. It’s his opinion that is harmful to a group of people. It is hatred. So, usually media outlets will not engage, endorse, or propagate outlandish and harmful speech. They will censor - or ignore - it.

Do You, Dear Reader, Censor?

You do! Usually this is called “a filter.” Some people are more connected to their filter than others.

Other times, this is called “walking away.” If you are talking to someone in person on the street (aka IRL), and they say something to you, and things get uncomfortable, you bid that person “Good-day,” and you walk away.

If that person yells at your back as you walk away, that is called rude, and bad sportsmanship. If that person continues to follow you, and starts sending you mail, you might chalk that up to stalking.

Does that person have a right to speak? Of course. And it is everyone else’s right to walk away and not want to hear it.

Here A Little Beacon Blog, We Have Guidelines

As does the Beacon Free Press, I’m sure. It is a great newspaper for learning about local events, opportunities for seniors, veterans, Dutchess County news, politics and more. A Little Beacon Blog generally does not cover elections, interviews with politicians, and other promotion of politics. We will, however, cover local issues that come out of politicking, of course.

We don’t publish submitted article comments that come from people who make up their names. Or who make up things about other people (this is called slander). Or who bash other businesses in order to protect their own business (though if they do it in our Instagram, we may leave those comments up for others to see, since they exposed themselves, and the public can make up their own minds on how they want to deal with such businesses).

We normally don’t delete submitted comments in social media, but do if it is harmful to someone or a group of people. However, we have started deleting memes, as funny as they are, because of emerging copyright law that is protecting the person in the meme who doesn’t want to be associated with whatever subject a person decided to attach their likeness to without their permission.

So yes. There is censorship. To be accused of censorship is at first uncomfortable, until you explore what it means to censor. Censoring isn’t always a bad thing. It is something that happens for good and bad reasons and should always be monitored.